
The nomination of retired Vice Admiral John Michael "Mike" McConnell to be Director of National Intelligence is part of an effort by the Vice President to tighten the Administration's grip on domestic intelligence and grease the wheels for a more aggressive stance towards Iran, current and former intelligence officials believe.
If confirmed, McConnell will replace current National Intelligence Director John Negroponte, who was tapped Friday to become Deputy Secretary of State under Secretary Condoleezza Rice. According to officials who spoke on condition of anonymity, Negroponte's exit followed a lengthy internal administration battle between the Office of the Vice President and the two-year-old Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
According to officials close to both men, two issues surround Negroponte's departure and McConnell's nomination: a forthcoming National Intelligence Estimate on Iran – which the White House could use to buttress a case for military force – and pressure from the Vice President to augment domestic surveillance.
Negroponte had resisted both efforts. Tensions soared after Negroponte made a public statement last year that countered the administration position that Iran was an immediate threat and that its alleged nuclear weapons program was in an advanced stage.
"The NIE on Iran is at issue," said one former senior intelligence officer close to Negroponte.
The National Intelligence Estimate is an interagency report that synthesizes information across all intelligence agencies on a particular topic, providing an overall assessment and analysis. In private conversations with RAW STORY, current and former US intelligence officials from various agencies raised concerns with McConnell's appointment and its effect on the Iran NIE.
"McConnell will go along with whatever [Cheney tells him to do] and make sure that no objective NIE comes out," one former senior intelligence officer said.
Thanks for posting this, i come across things like this that I feel have to be added to newsvine but worry that my column gets too dark. So you've free'd me up to link to something lighter like a goat in a tree or a flaming speaking toy.
Because they are important to.
:)
More bunnies and nuns, Winsome. Please.
I seeded this same article about 4 hours before it was seeded here. I thought the same article could only be seeded once, but I'm relatively new here so I may be wrong on that. Anyway, I thought it was a great article, and further proof that Bush cares nothing about intelligence unless it suits his own purposes.
Sorry Frank - normally the seeding panel would get a red header and alert me to the same article having already been seeded. And I would have joined your discussion rather than reseeded the same article - but I guess the doppelganger software isn't working at the moment. I notice that it still isn't telling me that there are two copies on the site, which it usually would just below the article body.
Thanks for being good about it - I'll try not to let it happen again, but that probably depends on the software alerting me :)
No problem at all, Djehuty. There is something definitely wrong with the software though. The same thing happened on the Newsvine Feminists group this morning - both merrydeath and I seeded the same article about Nancy Pelosi and they're both there on the group page. I just get a little frustrated because I think I seed some great articles and many of them have only one vote (mine). It makes me wonder if it's worth the effort.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |